References:

• Alberdi, A., Aizpurua, O., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Bohmann, K. (2018). Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 134-147.
• Baird, D. J., & Hajibabaei, M. (2012). Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next‐generation DNA sequencing.
• Banchi, E., Ametrano, C. G., Stanković, D., Verardo, P., Moretti, O., Gabrielli, F., … & Muggia, L. (2018). DNA metabarcoding uncovers fungal diversity of mixed airborne samples in Italy. PloS one, 13(3), e0194489. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0194489.
• Barnes, M. A., & Turner, C. R. (2016a). The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conservation genetics, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-015-0775-4.17.
• Barnes, M. A., & Turner, C. R. (2016b). The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conservation genetics, 17(1), 1-17.
• Barnes, M. A., Turner, C. R., Jerde, C. L., Renshaw, M. A., Chadderton, W. L., & Lodge, D. M. (2014). Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(3), 1819-1827.
• Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., … & Ferrer, E. A. (2011). Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471(7336), 51-57. 2011.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09678.
• Bashar, S., Bardhan, S., & Roy, R. (2022). An optimization-based study of the impact of different parameters on DNA degradation. Int J. Exp. Res. Rev., 28, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2022.v28.001
• Bohman, D. A., Vacher, C., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Raybould, A., Dumbrell, A. J., & Woodward, G. (2017). Next-generation global biomonitoring: large-scale, automated reconstruction of ecological networks. Trends in ecology & Evolution, 32(7), 477-487.
• Butchart, S. H., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P., Almond, R. E., … & Watson, R. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164-1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512.
• Clusa, L., Miralles, L., Basanta, A., Escot, C., & García-Vázquez, E. (2017). eDNA for detection of five highly invasive molluscs. A case study in urban rivers from the Iberian Peninsula. PloS one, 12(11), e0188126. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188126.
• Coissac, E., Riaz, T., & Puillandre, N. (2012). Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1834-1847. 47. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05550.
• Cowart, D. A., Murphy, K. R., & Cheng, C. H. C. (2018). Metagenomic sequencing of environmental DNA reveals marine faunal assemblages from the West Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Genomics, 37, 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2017.11.003.
• Creer, S., Deiner, K., Frey, S., Porazinska, D., Taberlet, P., Thomas, W. K., … & Bik, H. M. (2016). The ecologist’s field guide to sequence-based identification of biodiversity. Methods Ecol. Evol., 7, 1008–1018.
• Cristescu, M. E. (2014). From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(10), 566-571.
• Cristescu, M. E., & Hebert, P. D. (2018). Uses and misuses of environmental DNA in biodiversity science and conservation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 49, 209-230.
• Daan, N. (2001). The IBTS database: a plea for quality control. ICES CM, 3, 1-5.
• Davies, N., Meyer, C., Gilbert, J. A., Amaral-Zettler, L., Deck, J., Bicak, M., … & Field, D. (2012). A call for an international network of genomic observatories (GOs). GigaScience, 1(1).
• Deiner, K., Bik, H. M., Mächler, E., Seymour, M., Lacoursière‐Roussel, A., Altermatt, F., … & Bernatchez, L. (2017). Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Molecular Ecology, 26(21), 5872-5895.
• Díaz-Ferguson, E. E., & Moyer, G. R. (2014). History, applications, methodological issues and perspectives for the use environmental DNA (eDNA) in marine and freshwater environments. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 62(4), 1273-1284. https:// doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v62i4.13231.
• Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J., & Collen, B. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345(6195), 401-406. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.
• Egan, S. P., Barnes, M. A., Hwang, C. T., Mahon, A. R., Feder, J. L., Ruggiero, S. T., … & Lodge, D. M. (2013). Rapid invasive species detection by combining environmental DNA with light transmission spectroscopy. Conservation Letters, 6(6), 402-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12017.
• Epp, L. S., Boessenkool, S., Bellemain, E. P., Haile, J., Esposito, A., Riaz, T., … & Brochmann, C. (2012). New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1821-1833.
• Erickson, R. A., Rees, C. B., Coulter, A. A., Merkes, C. M., McCalla, S. G., Touzinsky, K. F., … & Amberg, J. J. (2016). Detecting the movement and spawning activity of bigheaded carps with environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology Resources, 16(4), 957-965. https://doi. org/10.1111/1755-0998.12533.
• Garlapati, D., Charankumar, B., Ramu, K., Madeswaran, P., & Ramana Murthy, M. V. (2019). A review on the applications and recent advances in environmental DNA (eDNA) metagenomics. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 18, 389-411. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11157-019-09501-4.
• Gibson, J. F., Shokralla, S., Curry, C., Baird, D. J., Monk, W. A., King, I., & Hajibabaei, M. (2015). Large-scale biomonitoring of remote and threatened ecosystems via high-throughput sequencing. PloS one, 10(10), e0138432.
• Giguet-Covex, C., Pansu, J., Arnaud, F., Rey, P. J., Griggo, C., Gielly, L., … & Taberlet, P. (2014). Long livestock farming history and human landscape shaping revealed by lake sediment DNA. Nature Communications, 5(1), 3211.
• Hering, D., Borja, A., Jones, J. I., Pont, D., Boets, P., Bouchez, A., … & Kelly, M. (2018). Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive. Water Research, 138, 192-205.
• Hofreiter, M., & Rompler, H. (2010). 19 Polymerase chain reaction: A blessing and a curse for ancient deoxyribonucleic acid research. This page Intentionally left Blank, 284.
• Hofreiter, M., Mead, J. I., Martin, P., & Poinar, H. N. (2003). Molecular caving. Current Biology, 13(18), R693-R695.
• Hopkins, G. W., & Freckleton, R. P. (2002, August). Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. In Animal Conservation Forum.  5(3), 245-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1367943002002299.
• Jarman, S. N., Berry, O., & Bunce, M. (2018). The value of environmental DNA biobanking for long-term biomonitoring. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(8), 1192-1193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559- 018-0614-3.
• Jones, J. B. (1992). Environmental impact of trawling on the seabed: a review. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 26(1), 59-67. 59–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 00288330.1992.9516500.
• Kelly, R. P., Port, J. A., Yamahara, K. M., Martone, R. G., Lowell, N., Thomsen, P. F., … & Crowder, L. B. (2014). Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management. Science, 344(6191), 1455-1456. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1251156
• Li, F., Mahon, A. R., Barnes, M. A., Feder, J., Lodge, D. M., Hwang, C. T… & Tanner, C. E. (2011). Quantitative and rapid DNA detection by laser transmission spectroscopy. PloS one, 6(12), e29224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0029224.
• Mahon, A. R., Barnes, M. A., Senapati, S., Feder, J. L., Darling, J. A., Chang, H. C., & Lodge, D. M. (2011). Molecular detection of invasive species in heterogeneous mixtures using a microfluidic carbon nanotube platform. PLoS One, 6(2), e17280. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017280.
• Minamoto, T., Yamanaka, H., Takahara, T., Honjo, M. N., & Kawabata, Z. I. (2012). Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology, 13, 193-197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-011-0362-4.
• Muha, T. P., Skukan, R., Borrell, Y. J., Rico, J. M., Garcia de Leaniz, C., Garcia‐Vazquez, E., & Consuegra, S. (2019). Contrasting seasonal and spatial distribution of native and invasive Codium seaweed revealed by targeting species‐specific eDNA. Ecology and Evolution, 9(15), 8567-8579. . https://doi.org/10. 1002/ece3.5379.
• Paige, K. N. (2010). The functional genomics of inbreeding depression: a new approach to an old problem. BioScience, 60(4), 267-277. https://doi.org/10. 1525/bio.2010.60.4.5
• Pal, A., Bandyopadhyay, B., Dey, S., Ganguli, S., Singh, P., & De, M. (2017). Documentation and diversity analysis by DNA fingerprinting of the indigenous Mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm of West Bengal. Int. J. Exp. Res. Rev., 11, 21-34.
• Pawłowska, J., Lejzerowicz, F., Esling, P., Szczuciński, W., Zajączkowski, M., & Pawlowski, J. (2014). Ancient DNA sheds new light on the Svalbard foraminiferal fossil record of the last millennium. Geobiology, 12(4), 277-288.
• Pedersen, M. W., Overballe-Petersen, S., Ermini, L., Sarkissian, C. D., Haile, J., Hellstrom, M., … & Willerslev, E. (2015). Ancient and modern environmental DNA. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1660), 20130383.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.
• Pinakhina, D. V., & Chekunova, E. M. (2020). Environmental DNA: History of studies, current and perspective applications in fundamental and applied research. Ecological genetics, 18(4), 493-509. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen25900.
• Pont, D., Rocle, M., Valentini, A., Civade, R., Jean, P., Maire, A., … & Dejean, T. (2018). Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 10361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28424-8.
• Rees, H. C., Bishop, K., Middleditch, D. J., Patmore, J. R., Maddison, B. C., & Gough, K. C. (2014). The application of eDNA for monitoring of the Great Crested Newt in the UK. Ecology and Evolution, 4(21), 4023-4032. https://doi.org/10. 1002/ece3.1272.
• Rodgers, T. W., & Mock, K. E. (2015). Drinking water as a source of environmental DNA for the detection of terrestrial wildlife species. Conservation Genetics Resources, 7, 693-696.
• Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2019). Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17, e00547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gecco.2019.e00547.
• Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G., & Waples, R. S. (2007). Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(1), 25-33. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.009.
• Sengupta, M. E., Hellström, M., Kariuki, H. C., Olsen, A., Thomsen, P. F., Mejer, H., … & Vennervald, B. J. (2019). Environmental DNA for improved detection and environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(18), 8931-8940. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815046116.
• Seymour, M., Durance, I., Cosby, B. J., Ransom-Jones, E., Deiner, K., Ormerod, S. J., … & Creer, S. (2018). Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms. Communications Biology, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-017- 0005-3.
• Sharfuddin, N., Anwer, F., & Ali, S. (2023). A Novel Cryptographic Technique for Cloud Environment Based on Feedback DNA. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 32, 323-339. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2023.v32.028
• Shokralla, S., Spall, J. L., Gibson, J. F., & Hajibabaei, M. (2012). Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1794-1805. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05538.
• Simmons, M., Tucker, A., Chadderton, W. L., Jerde, C. L., & Mahon, A. R. (2016). Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 73(1), 76-83.
• Simmons, M., Tucker, A., Chadderton, W. L., Jerde, C. L., & Mahon, A. R. (2016). Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 73(1), 76-83.
• Steiner, C. C., Putnam, A. S., Hoeck, P. E., & Ryder, O. A. (2013). Conservation genomics of threatened animal species. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 1(1), 261-281.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103636.
• Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C., & Willerslev, E. (2012). Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 2045-2050.
• Takahara, T., Minamoto, T., Yamanaka, H., Doi, H., & Kawabata, Z. I. (2012). Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PloS one, 7(4), e35868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035868.
• Thomsen, P. F., Kielgast, J., Iversen, L. L., Møller, P. R., Rasmussen, M., & Willerslev, E. (2012). Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0041732.
• Tong, X., Xu, H., Zou, L., Cai, M., Xu, X., Zhao, Z., … & Li, Y. (2017). High diversity of airborne fungi in the hospital environment as revealed by meta-sequencing-based microbiome analysis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 39606. https://doi. org/10.1038/srep39606.
• UNEP, 2011. UNEP/CBD/COP/10/27. Report of the Tenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 18–29 October 2010, Nagoya, Japan.
• Ushio, M., Fukuda, H., Inoue, T., Makoto, K., Kishida, O., Sato, K., … & Miya, M. (2017). Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17(6), e63-e75.
• Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2009). DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24(2), 110-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011.
• Vié, J. C., Hilton-Taylor, C., & Stuart, S. N. (Eds.). (2009). Wildlife in a changing world: an analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of threatened species. IUCN.
• Wheeler, Q. D., Raven, P. H., & Wilson, E. O. (2004). Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science, 303(5656), 285-285.
• Willerslev, E., Hansen, A. J., Binladen, J., Brand, T. B., Gilbert, M. T. P., Shapiro, B., … & Cooper, A. (2003). Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments. Science, 300(5620), 791-795. Yoccoz, N. G. (2012). The future of environmental DNA in ecology. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 2031-2038.