Pyrococcus abyssi‘s Methionine-tRNA Synthetase Exhibits Hyperthermophilic Signatures in Its Weak Forces and Cavities

Sahini Banerjee
Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Amal Kumar Bandyopadhyay
Department of Biotechnology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, India
OrchideID Icon https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3499-5491

Published online:30th November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52756/lbsopf.2024.e03.008

Keywords: Salt-bridge and microenvironment, energetics, weak forces, interior cavity

Abstract:

Weak forces, including the salt-bridge and the inner cavity, are of particular importance in protein folding and functioning in extreme environments. A comparative study on these may reveal insights into the intrinsic protein thermostability.  Here, we study salt-bridge energetics and its microenvironment, other weak interactions, and interior cavity properties of Methionine-tRNA synthetase from hyperthermophilic, Pyrococcus abyssi (PMRS) and mesophilic, E. coli (EMRS). Results show that PMRS, which is more hydrophilic, is uniquely distinct from EMRS. PMRS’s complete and domain-specific sequences are favorable for more salt-bridges and other weak interactions than EMRS’s. In the former, the recruitment of excess networked, long-ranged, and inter-domain salt bridges with energetically advantageous pairs and ME around them suggests that these properties originate from the underlying sequence. The fact that the net stability (ΔΔGnet) per salt bridge of PMRS exceeds that of EMRS denotes a novel design in its salt bridge. Furthermore, compared to EMRS, an excess of hydrogen bonds (HyB), hydrophobic, and other electrostatic interactions in PMRS’s core and surface demonstrate that these also contribute to its thermostability. Notably, PMRS has a much lower level of water-mediated HyB than EMRS, pointing to an altered strategy. In addition, compared to EMRS, a lower and higher mostly empty interior cavities in PMRS’s core and surface, respectively, indicate that surface engineering is more prominent in PMRS. We think that these differences are indeed related to the thermostability of the PMRS, which would apply to other similar systems.

References:

  • Anfinsen, C. B. (1973). Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains. Science, 181(4096), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4096.223
  • Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J., & McCammon, J. A. (2001). Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(18), 10037–10041. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181342398
  • Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2020). Salt-Bridges in the Microenvironment of Stable Protein Structures. Bioinformation, 16(11), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630016900
  • Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Ul Islam, R. N., Mitra, D., Banerjee, S., & Goswami, A. (2019). Stability of buried and networked salt-bridges (BNSB) in thermophilic proteins. Bioinformation, 15(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630015061
  • Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Ul Islam, R. N., Mitra, D., Banerjee, S., & Goswami, A. (2019). Structural insights from water-ferredoxin interaction in mesophilic algae and halophilic archaea. Bioinformation, 15(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630015079
  • Banerjee, S., Gupta, P. S. S., Islam, R. N. U., & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2021). Intrinsic basis of thermostability of prolyl oligopeptidase from Pyrococcus furiosus. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90723-4
  • Banerjee, S., Gupta, P., Nayek, A., Das, S., Sur, V. P., Seth, P., Islam, R. N. U., & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2015). PHYSICO2: an UNIX based standalone procedure for computation of physicochemical, window-dependent and substitution based evolutionary properties of protein sequences along with automated block preparation tool, version 2. Bioinformation, 11(7), 366–368. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630011366
  • Biswas, I., Mitra, D., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., & Das Mohapatra, P. K. (2020). Contributions of protein microenvironment in tannase industrial applicability: An in-silico comparative study of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacterial tannase. Heliyon6(11), e05359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05359
  • Crepin, T., Schmitt, E., Blanquet, S., & Mechulam, Y. (2004). Three-Dimensional Structure of Methionyl-tRNA Synthetase from Pyrococcus abyssi, Biochemistry, 43(9), 2635–2644. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0356247
  • Crepin, T., Schmitt, E., Mechulam, Y., Sampson, P. B., Vaughan, M. D., Honek, J. F., & Blanquet, S. (2003). Use of Analogues of Methionine and Methionyl Adenylate to Sample Conformational Changes During Catalysis in Escherichia coli Methionyl-tRNA Synthetase. Journal of Molecular Biology, 332(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00917-3
  • Dill, K. A. (1990). Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry, 29(31), 7133–7155. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00483a001
  • Dolinsky, T. J., Nielsen, J. E., McCammon, J. A., & Baker, N. A. (2004). PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(Web Server), W665–W667. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh381
  • Dubey, V., & Jagannadham, M. (2008). Roles for Cavities in Protein Structure: New Insights. Current Proteomics, 5(3), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.2174/157016408785909668
  • Gupta, P., Nayek, A., Banerjee, S., Seth, P., Das, S., Pratap Sur, V., Roy, C., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2015). SBION2: Analyses of Salt Bridges from Multiple Structure Files, Version 2. Bioinformation, 11(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630011039
  • Hurley, J. H., Baase, W. A., & Matthews, B. W. (1992). Design and structural analysis of alternative hydrophobic core packing arrangements in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. Journal of Molecular Biology, 224(4), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(92)90475-y
  • Kumar, S., Ma, B., Tsai, C.J., & Nussinov, R. (2000). Electrostatic strengths of salt bridges in thermophilic and mesophilic glutamate dehydrogenase monomers. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 38(4), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000301)38:4<368::aid-prot3>3.0.co;2-r
  • Kumar, S., Tsai, C.J., & Nussinov, R. (2000). Factors enhancing protein thermostability. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 13(3), 179–191.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/13.3.179
  • Martinez, C. R., & Iverson, B. L. (2012). Rethinking the term “pi-stacking. Chemical Science, 3(7), 2191. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sc20045g
  • Mecozzi, S., West, A. P., & Dougherty, D. A. (1996). Cation-pi interactions in aromatics of biological and medicinal interest: electrostatic potential surfaces as a useful qualitative guide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(20), 10566–10571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.20.10566
  • Menéndez-Arias, L., & Argosf, P. (1989). Engineering protein thermal stability. Journal of Molecular Biology, 206(2), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(89)90488-9
  • Meuzelaar, H., Vreede, J., & Woutersen, S. (2016). Influence of Glu/Arg, Asp/Arg, and Glu/Lys Salt Bridges on α -Helical Stability and Folding Kinetics. Biophysical Journal, 110(11), 2328–2341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.015
  • Nayek, A., Banerjee, S., & Gupta, P. (2015). ADSETMEAS: Automated Determination of Salt-bridge Energy Terms and Micro Environment from Atomic Structures using APBS method, version 1.0, Prot. Sci., 24(2015), 216-217.
  • Nayek, A., Sen Gupta, P. S., Banerjee, S., Mondal, B., & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2014). Salt-Bridge Energetics in Halophilic Proteins. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093862
  • Puchkaev, A. V., Koo, L. S., & Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (2003). Aromatic stacking as a determinant of the thermal stability of CYP119 from Sulfolobus solfataricus. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 409(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9861(02)00402-2
  • Russell, R. J. M., Ferguson, J. M. C., Hough, D. W., Danson, M. J., & Taylor, G. L. (1997). The Crystal Structure of Citrate Synthase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus at 1.9Å Resolution. Biochemistry, 36(33), 9983–9994.
    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9705321
  • Sternke, M., Tripp, K. W., & Barrick, D. (2019). The use of consensus sequence information to engineer stability and activity in proteins. Methods in Enzymology643, 149-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2020.06.001
  • Sumida, K. H., Núñez-Franco, R., Kalvet, I., Pellock, S. J., Wicky, B. I. M., Milles, L. F., Dauparas, J., Wang, J., Kipnis, Y., Jameson, N., Kang, A., De La Cruz, J., Sankaran, B., Bera, A. K., Jiménez-Osés, G., & Baker, D. (2024). Improving Protein Expression, Stability, and Function with ProteinMPNN. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 146(3), 2054–2061. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c10941
  • Szilágyi, A., & Závodszky, P. (2000). Structural differences between mesophilic, moderately thermophilic and extremely thermophilic protein subunits: Results of a comprehensive survey. Structure, 8(5), 493-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00133-7
  • Tsodikov, O. V., Record, M. T., & Sergeev, Y. V. (2002). Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 23(6), 600–609. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10061
  • Vogt, G., Woell, S., & Argos, P. (1997). Protein thermal stability, hydrogen bonds, and ion pairs. Journal of Molecular Biology, 269(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1042
  • Williams, R. W., Chang, A., Juretić, D., & Loughran, S. (1987). Secondary structure predictions and medium range interactions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 916(2), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838(87)90109-9
  • Yip, K. S. P., Britton, K. L., Stillman, T. J., Lebbink, J., de Vos, W. M., Robb, F. T., Vetriani, C., Maeder, D., & Rice, D. W. (1998). Insights into the molecular basis of thermal stability from the analysis of ion‐pair networks in the Glutamate Dehydrogenase family. European Journal of Biochemistry, 255(2), 336–346. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2550336.x

check for update

Life as Basic Science: An Overview and Prospects for Future [Volume: 3]

How to Cite
Sahini Banerjee and Amal Kumar Bandyopadhyay (2024). Pyrococcus abyssi‘s Methionine-tRNA Synthetase Exhibits Hyperthermophilic Signatures in its Weak Forces and Cavities. © International Academic Publishing House (IAPH), Dr. Somnath Das, Dr. Jayanta Kumar Das, Dr. Mayur Doke and Dr. Vincent Avecilla (eds.), Life as Basic Science: An Overview and Prospects for the Future Volume: 3, pp. 180-208. ISBN: 978-81-978955-7-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52756/lbsopf.2024.e03.008

SHARE WITH EVERYONE

Continue reading in any device

Continue reading in any device